tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8763870719324376396.post1617330804880679206..comments2023-06-09T10:31:29.812+01:00Comments on The Liturgical Pimpernel: It’s time to think outside the box, MonsignorThe Liturgical Pimpernelhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06937184037752964023noreply@blogger.comBlogger3125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8763870719324376396.post-60188028884680755362011-04-05T05:05:12.755+01:002011-04-05T05:05:12.755+01:00Methinks Msgr. Mannion's a company man. He...Methinks Msgr. Mannion's a company man. He's writing for <i>Our Sunday Visitor</i>, an American Catholic newsweekly that's firmly broad church. He's not going to get all gung-ho about SP and alienate the readership.<br /><br />Leave him be. We need a spectrum of opinions.sortacatholicnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8763870719324376396.post-20000527915116600002011-04-03T20:15:23.774+01:002011-04-03T20:15:23.774+01:00The problem that Mannion does not want to face is ...The problem that Mannion does not want to face is that the drafters of the Ordinary Form intended for the Mass-liturgy to change as needed, it was to be a "living liturgy." The drafters of the Ordinary Form did not expect it to be static and frozen, as many alleged the mass was before the Council. Proof this may be found in the back of the 1970 book by the late Father Roguet, O.P. entitled "The New Mass." Father Roguet was a member of the Concilium (sic) and was in a position to know. I agree, Pimpernel, we should reform the Ordinary Form, otherwise, hee, hee, we are not being faithful to the vision of the Ordinary Form.<br /><br />James Ignatius McAuleyAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8763870719324376396.post-50389606454965662132011-04-02T22:54:32.118+01:002011-04-02T22:54:32.118+01:00We must all, traditionalist, reform of the reform ...We must all, traditionalist, reform of the reform and "neo-con" alike, move beyond the politics and polemics of the 1970's, 1980's and 1990's.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com